HKSAR v. Hung Wai-hon, Michael

Read the full judgment text of HCCC 140/2020 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 23 October 2020.

Case No.HCCC 140/2020[2021] HKCFI 2495
Court
High Court CFI
Date23 Oct 2020
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCC 140/2020

[2021] HKCFI 2495

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CRIMINAL CASE NO 140 OF 2020

________________________

  HKSAR  
  v  
  Hung Wai-hon, Michael  

________________________

Before:  Hon S T Poon J
Date:  23 October 2020 at 11.54 am
Present:  Mr Chan Ho-cheung Raymond, PP of the Department of Justice, for HKSAR
  Ms Priscilia T Y Lam, instructed by Ivan Tang & Co, assigned by DLA, for the accused
Offence:   Trafficking in a dangerous drug (販運危險藥物)

________________________

Transcript of the Audio Recording
of the Sentence in the above Case

________________________

COURT: The defendant pleaded guilty to one count of trafficking in dangerous drugs before a magistrate. Now, the relevant drugs involved are 34.1 grammes of a crystalline solid containing 21.2 grammes of methamphetamine hydrochloride, commonly known as ‘Ice’.

On 17 April 2019, the police mounted an anti-narcotics operation and ambushed an unit in Tin Chung Estate, Tin Shui Wai. Inside a bedroom in the premises, the defendant was found. Upon search, the relevant drugs were found inside the premises. The defendant now admits that the relevant drugs were possessed by him for the purpose of trafficking.

The defendant has eight previous criminal records within which two convictions were in relation to possession of dangerous drugs.

The defendant is 28 years old, educated up to Form 5 level. He was unemployed at the time of his arrest. He was divorced with a 12 years’ old daughter who is living with the defendant’s ex-wife.

As submitted by Ms Lam, counsel for the defendant, the Court of Appeal has laid down sentencing tariff in respect of trafficking in dangerous drugs. For trafficking between 10 to 70 grammes of ‘Ice’, the appropriate starting point is 7 to 11 years’ imprisonment. The sentencing guideline has been laid down in the Court of Appeal case of HKSAR v Tam Yi Chun.

In the present case, the relevant quantity of ‘Ice’ is 21.2 grammes. The appropriate starting point should be around 92.93 months’ imprisonment as submitted by Ms Lam. There is no valid mitigating factors in this case, apart from the defendant’s early plea of guilty. Taking into account the defendant’s background, in particular, he is himself a drug addict, I will adopt a slightly lower starting point of 90 months’ imprisonment. Taking into account the defendant’s guilty plea, the sentence is reduced to 60 months’ imprisonment.