Cheung Kong Property (Business Development) Ltd v. Gold Brilliant Investment Ltd and Another

Read the full judgment text of HCA 280/2021 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 16 August 2021.

1.  Paragraph 52 should read as “The costs of the Summons go to the Plaintiff on an indemnity basis, with certificate for two counsel.”

Cited by 4 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCA 280/2021[2021] HKCFI 2330
Court
High Court CFI
Date16 Aug 2021
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 280/2021

[2021] HKCFI 2330

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 280 OF 2021

____________

BETWEEN    
  CHEUNG KONG PROPERTY
(BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT) LIMITED
Plaintiff
 
and
  GOLD BRILLIANT INVESTMENT LIMITED 1st Defendant
  PAN SUTONG
2nd Defendant

____________

Before:  Deputy High Court Judge Abraham Chan, SC in Chambers (By Paper Disposal)

Date of Plaintiff’s Submissions:  18 March 2021

Date of Defendants’ Submissions:  25 March 2021

Date of Plaintiff’s Reply Submissions: 8 April 2021

Date of Decision on Costs:  16 August 2021

Date of Corrigendum:  15 September 2021

______________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

______________________________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Decision on Costs dated 16 August 2021.

1.  Paragraph 52 should read as “The costs of the Summons go to the Plaintiff on an indemnity basis, with certificate for two counsel.”

  (Michael Chan)
  Clerk to Deputy High Court Judge
  Abraham Chan SC