Re Khan Najam
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 1913/2020 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 15 October 2021.
1. This is the applicant’s application for extension of time for appeal. His application is considered with the following background.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case
|
HCAL 1913/2020 [2021] HKCFI 2973 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 1913 OF 2020 _____________
_____________ Before: Deputy High Court Judge K.W. Lung in Chambers Date of Decision: 15 October 2021 _____________ D E C I S I O N _____________ The application 1.This is the applicant’s application for extension of time for appeal. His application is considered with the following background. 2.The applicant filed Form 86 on 24 September 2020 for application for leave to apply for judicial review of the Decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board. 3.By affirmation dated 3 August 2021, the applicant applied to the Court that he wanted to withdraw his application for judicial review for the reason that his problem had been solved and he wanted to return home. 4.The Court of Appeal in AW v. Director of Immigration and William Lam CACV 63 of 2015, 3 November 2015 held that if the applicant’s application serves no practical purpose, the application should not be granted. As such, the Court had, by its Order dated 18 August 2021, dismissed his application for leave to apply for judicial review of the Board’s Decision. 5.Upon the dismissal of his application, the Court becomes functus officio. The Court has no further jurisdiction over the matter. 6.The application is therefore dismissed.
The applicant was unrepresented |
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 1913/2020