Taching Petroleum Co Ltd v. Meyer Aluminium Ltd

Read the full judgment text of CTA 1/2018 on BabelCite. This CTA judgment was delivered on 12 October 2021.

1.  Page 75 at paragraph 224: “It had paid all the amounts under the unpaid invoices into the Court of First Instance.” should read as “It had paid all the amounts under the unpaid invoices of Taching into the Court of First Instance.”.

Cites 1 case

Case No.CTA 1/2018
Court
CTA
Date12 Oct 2021
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CTA 1/2018 &
CTA 2/2018

[2021] HKCT 2

IN THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL ACTION NO 1 OF 2018

____________

BETWEEN    
  TACHING PETROLEUM COMPANY LIMITED Plaintiff

and

  MEYER ALUMINIUM LIMITED Defendant

____________

AND

IN THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL ACTION NO 2 OF 2018

____________

BETWEEN    
  SHELL HONG KONG LIMITED Plaintiff

and

  MEYER ALUMINIUM LIMITED Defendant

____________

(Heard Together)

Before: Hon Au-Yeung J, Deputy President

Dates of Hearing: 27-30 July, 2, 3 and 9 August 2021

Date of Judgment:  12 October 2021

Date of Corrigendum:  1 November 2021

____________________

CORRIGENDUM

____________________

Please note the following amendment in the Judgment dated 12 October 2021:

1.  Page 75 at paragraph 224: “It had paid all the amounts under the unpaid invoices into the Court of First Instance.” should read as “It had paid all the amounts under the unpaid invoices of Taching into the Court of First Instance.”.

    (CHEUNG Man-kit)
  Clerk to the Honourable Madam Justice
Au-Yeung