Saidy Lamin Ia v. Torture Claims Appeal Board/ Non-refoulement Claims Petiton Office

CACV 267/2021

[2021] HKCA 1819

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO 267 OF 2021

(ON APPEAL FROM HCAL NO 921 OF 2017)

________________________

_____________________

Before: Hon Chow JA and ST Poon J in Court

Date of Judgment: 8 December 2021

_____________________

JUDGMENT

_____________________

Hon Chow JA (giving the Judgment of the Court):

1.On 1 November 2021, this Court gave its judgment (“the CA Judgment”) dismissing the Applicant’s appeal against the order of Campbell-Moffat J dated 19 May 2020 refusing to grant leave to the Applicant to apply for judicial review of the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office dated 10 October 2017.

2.The Applicant now applies by Notice of Motion dated 9 November 2021 for leave to appeal the CA Judgment to the Court of Final Appeal.  In the Notice of Motion, the following is stated: “I want to challenge the decision.”

3.Under s 22(1)(b) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap 484, an appeal shall lie to the Court of Final Appeal at the discretion of, inter alia, the Court of Appeal in any civil cause or matter if, in the opinion of the Court of Appeal the question involved in the appeal is one which, by reason of its great general or public importance, or otherwise, ought to be submitted to the Court of Final Appeal for decision.

4.No question of great general or public importance involved in the proposed appeal is identified in the Notice of Motion.  We are unable to see any such question being involved in the proposed appeal.  There is also no basis to grant leave to appeal on the “otherwise” limb in s 22(1)(b) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance.

5.Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal is refused and the Notice of Motion is dismissed.

The Applicant, unrepresented, appeared in person