Yuen Chuen-kit v. The Queen
Read the full judgment text of CACC 172/1977 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. The appellant was originally charged with one count of possession of dangerous drugs for the purpose of unlawful trafficking. The particulars of the offence stated that the dangerous drug concerned was "44.3 grammes of a mixture containing 19.9 grammes of salts of ester of morphine." During the trial in the District Court the appellant pleaded guilty to being in possession, for the purpose of trafficking, of part only of those drugs namely 6.7 grammes of a mixture containing 2.9 grammes of sa
|
CACC000172/1977
Coram: Briggs, C.J., Huggins & Pickering, JJ.A. Date of Judgment: 26th April, 1977. ----------------- JUDGMENT ----------------- 1. The appellant was originally charged with one count of possession of dangerous drugs for the purpose of unlawful trafficking. The particulars of the offence stated that the dangerous drug concerned was "44.3 grammes of a mixture containing 19.9 grammes of salts of ester of morphine." During the trial in the District Court the appellant pleaded guilty to being in possession, for the purpose of trafficking, of part only of those drugs namely 6.7 grammes of a mixture containing 2.9 grammes of salts of ester of morphine. He was sentenced to three years' imprisonment and appeals against that sentence. 2. We think that a sentence of three years for this relatively small amount of heroin is excessive. If the case had been brought in the Magistrates Court the sentence would not have been one of three years. 3. Before us the appellant stated that the reason he was in possession of the heroin was that he used it as a medicine for a rash on his body. That was not advanced in the court below and it is a story which we regard with some scepticism. However that may be we think the sentence excessive in regard to this quantity of the drug, the more so since the appellant had previously a clear record. 4. In the circumstances, we will reduce the sentence from three years to eighteen months' imprisonment.
Representation: Appellant in person. Sharwood for Crown. |