Read the full judgment text of CACV 000054/1974 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 11 December 1974.
2. In so far as the present action claims an injunction for a period which comes within the period of the master contract there is clearly an estoppel per rem judicatem. Once it is recognised that Briggs, J. could have granted an injunction to cover the period of any extension of the master contract resulting from the exercise of a valid option it follows that the Plaintiff's remedy by way of injunction was exhausted in the first action. That alone is enough to dispose of the appeal, but the con