Spm Ltd v. Appeal Tribunal (Buildings Ordinance)
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 1574/2021 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 19 April 2022.
1. At page 25 between line B and C, the words, “In the circumstances, I order SPM’s costs to be paid by the Building Authority, to be taxed it not agreed.”, should read as “In the circumstances, I order SPM’s costs (inclusive of the costs incurred in proceedings of the Appeal Tribunal (Building Ordiance)) to be paid by the Building Authority, to be taxed it not agreed.”;
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case
|
HCAL 1574/2021 [2022] HKCFI 1105 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 1574 OF 2021 ________________________
________________________
___________________ CORRIGENDUM ___________________ Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 19 April 2022: - 1. At page 25 between line B and C, the words, “In the circumstances, I order SPM’s costs to be paid by the Building Authority, to be taxed it not agreed.”, should read as “In the circumstances, I order SPM’s costs (inclusive of the costs incurred in proceedings of the Appeal Tribunal (Building Ordiance)) to be paid by the Building Authority, to be taxed it not agreed.”; Dated the 10th day of May 2022
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 1574/2021