Re Shoaib Muhammad
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 190/2019 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 1 June 2022.
1. The applicant is an illegal immigrant. He lodged non-refoulement claim with the Immigration Department and was rejected by the Director of Immigration. He appealed to the Torture Claims Appeal Board (the “Board”) and, by the Board’s Decision, his appeal was dismissed by the Board.
Cited by 1 case
|
HCAL 190/2019 [2022] HKCFI 1498 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 190 OF 2019 _____________
_____________
_______________ D E C I S I O N _______________ 1.The applicant is an illegal immigrant. He lodged non-refoulement claim with the Immigration Department and was rejected by the Director of Immigration. He appealed to the Torture Claims Appeal Board (the “Board”) and, by the Board’s Decision, his appeal was dismissed by the Board. 2.The applicant filed Form 86 on 21 January 2019 for application for leave to apply for judicial review of the Board’s Decision. 3.The Court had considered his application on paper and Form CALL-1 had been prepared, dismissing his application, to be dispatched on 20 April 2022. 4.The applicant filed an affirmation dated 12 April 2022 to withdraw his application because his political problem has been solved and he wants to go back to his country. 5.Since his application has been determined by this Court by Form CALL-1, this application does not have any effect on the application. 6.The Court therefore makes no order on this application.
The applicant was unrepresented. |
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 190/2019