Read the full judgment text of CAAR 000002/1981 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. This is an application by the Attorney General for the review of sentence. The two respondents were convicted by a jury of an offence under section 37C of the Immigration Ordinance. The first respondent was convicted under paragraph (b) of that subsection the reason being that he was the owner of the vessel involved in the offence. The second respondent was convicted under paragraph (a) as a crew member. The offence was committed on the 11th of May 1980 when the fishing vessel owned by the fi