Re Khan Md Al Amin
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 218/2022 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 2 August 2022.
1. The applicant remains in Hong Kong without permission of the Director of Immigration. He lodged a subsequent non-refoulement claim with the Immigration Department and was rejected by the Director of Immigration.
Cited by 1 case
|
HCAL 218/2022 [2022] HKCFI 2238 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 218 OF 2022 _____________
_____________
______________ D E C I S I O N ______________ The application 1.The applicant remains in Hong Kong without permission of the Director of Immigration. He lodged a subsequent non-refoulement claim with the Immigration Department and was rejected by the Director of Immigration. 2.The applicant filed Form 86 on 14 April 2022 for leave to apply for judicial review of the Director’s Decision. 3.By an order dated 16 June 2022, the Court dismissed his application and imposed a Restrictive Proceedings Order on the applicant. 4.The applicant sent a letter dated 10 June 2022 to the court, in which he stated that he wanted to withdraw his application for judicial review. He wants to return to his country as his mother is very ill. 5.Since his application has been dismissed, it is unnecessary to make further order for his application for withdrawal. I order that there will be no order to be made for his application.
The applicant was unrepresented. |
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 218/2022