Arwinder Singh v. Secretary for Security and Another

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 675/2022 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 10 August 2022.

1.  At page 4 between line I and J, the words, “convicted of dabbling”, should read as “convicted of gambling”;

Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCAL 675/2022[2022] HKCFI 2470
Court
High Court CFI
Date10 Aug 2022
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL 675/2022

[2022] HKCFI 2470

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 675 OF 2022

________________________

BETWEEN

  ARWINDER SINGH Applicant
  and  
  SECRETARY FOR SECURITY 1st Respondent
  DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION 2nd Respondent

________________________

Before:  Hon Coleman J in Court

Date of Decision:  10 August 2022

Date of Corrigendum:  22 August 2022

________________________

CORRIGENDUM

________________________


Please note the following corrigendum in the Decision dated 10 August 2022: -

1.  At page 4 between line I and J, the words, “convicted of dabbling”, should read as “convicted of gambling”;

2.  At page 4 between line O and P, the words, “see has been made”, should read as “he has been made”;

3.  At page 5 between line F and G, the words, “last occasion on 6 May 2016”, should read as “last occasion on 6 May 2021”;

4.  At page 6 between line K and L, the words, “with expectation”, should read as “with expedition”;

5.  At page 6 between line P and Q, the words, “Subject’as criminal records”, should read as “Subject’s criminal records”;

6.  At page 6 between line Q and R, the words, “deported offence”, should read as “deportable offence”;

7.  At page 6 line T, the words, “court”, should read as “Court”;

8.  At page 7 between line B and C, the words, “is a PR female who claim to be”, should read as “is HKPR female who claimed to be”;

9.  At page 7 between line L and M, the words, “not warranted 14 release on recognizance”, should read as “not a warranted one for release on recognizance”;

10.  At page 16 between line N and O, the words, “intend to deport”, should read as “intend to remove”;

11.  At page 17 between line B and C, the words, “to effect deportation”, should read as “to effect removal”;

12.  At page 17 between line Q and R, the words, “the Applicant’as”, should read as “the Applicant’s”;

Dated the 22nd day of August 2022

(Alvin Kwok)
for Registrar, High Court

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 675/2022