Read the full judgment text of HCAL 673/2019 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 13 October 2022.
1. The applicant is an illegal immigrant for staying in Hong Kong without permission and he lodged a non-refoulement claim with the Director of Immigration (the “Director”). The Director, by his Decisions, rejected his application and he appealed to the Torture Claims Appeal Board (the “Board”). The Director had made 2 decisions, the first one on his claim on Torture risk, BOR 3 risk and Persecution risk; the second one on BOR 2 risk. He appealed against the Director’s First Decision and failed.
Cited by 3 cases · Cites 6 cases