Read the full judgment text of CACV 000067/1976 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. The trial judge treated this application for workman's compensation as though it were an application under s.17(5) of the Ordinance to cancel the agreement in writing made between the employer and the workman as to the compensation to be paid. Counsel for the appellant workman contends that he was wrong in so doing, because the agreement was not, or might not be, one which came within the purview of s.17 at all, and that his client was, by reason of the course which the proceedings followed i