China Metal Recycling (Holdings) Ltd (in Liquidation) v. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (A Firm)

Read the full judgment text of HCA 1517/2016 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 29 November 2022.

1. On 29 November 2022 I heard a case management conference (" CMC ") for the further conduct of this Action until witness statements and experts’ reports had been exchanged. At the CMC a discussion took place concerning fixing trial dates. This was largely driven by the anticipated length of the trial (currently estimated by the Plaintiff at 8 weeks and the Defendant at 11 weeks) and the difficulty the parties anticipated there might be in obtaining dates within a reasonable period if they were

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCA 1517/2016[2022] HKCFI 3793
Court
High Court CFI
Date29 Nov 2022
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 1517/2016

[2022] HKCFI 3793

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 1517 OF 2016

________________

BETWEEN

  CHINA METAL RECYCLING (HOLDINGS) LIMITED Plaintiff
  (IN LIQUIDATION)  
  and  
  DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU (A FIRM) Defendant

________________

Before: Hon Harris J in Chambers
Date of Hearing: 29 November 2022
Date of Decision: 29 November 2022
Date of Reasons for Decision: 21 December 2022

__________________________________

REASONS FOR DECISION

__________________________________

1.On 29 November 2022 I heard a case management conference ("CMC") for the further conduct of this Action until witness statements and experts’ reports had been exchanged. At the CMC a discussion took place concerning fixing trial dates. This was largely driven by the anticipated length of the trial (currently estimated by the Plaintiff at 8 weeks and the Defendant at 11 weeks) and the difficulty the parties anticipated there might be in obtaining dates within a reasonable period if they were not allocated until after evidence had been exchanged. In principle I agreed that trial dates should now be allocated. However, I explained that as I might not be the trial judge I would clarify who would hear it. Having done so I do not anticipate hearing the trial. Therefore, I will not fix dates now, but direct that it is dealt with at the next CMC before what I expect will be the trial Judge.

  (Jonathan Harris)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Mr Justin Ho, instructed by Holman Fenwick Willan, for the plaintiff (attends the hearing remotely)

Mr Jason Yu, instructed by Clyde & Co, for the defendant