Read the full judgment text of FCMC 596/2022 on BabelCite. This Family Court judgment was delivered on 9 December 2022 before Deputy District Judge W.Y. Ho.
Injunction – Matrimonial Proceedings – Material Non-disclosure – Freezing Order – District Court – Matrimonial Assets – Costs – s.17 MPPO – s.52B DCO – Parties married in 2008 with two children purchased property and car park – Petitioner claimed Respondent sold properties to Ms. W without consent – Ex-parte injunction granted 11 April 2022 to freeze assets and deposit proceeds – Respondent contested continuation – Court found material non-disclosure regarding prior agreement to sell but exercised discretion to continue injunction – Paragraphs 1, 2(1), 3(1), 3(2) discharged; Paragraph 2(2) continued – Respondent to pay Petitioner's costs of discharge application; interlocutory costs reserved; argument hearing costs apportioned 50/50
Legal issues: Material non-disclosure (Prior agreement to sell) · Material non-disclosure (Domicile) · Discretion to continue injunction · Costs
Outcome: Injunction partially discharged, partially continued. Costs order made.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 2 cases