Golam Rasul v. Hong Kong Sar Government
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 1185/2022 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 19 December 2022.
1. At page 6 between line G and I, the words, “During the detention, the Applicant has repeatedly showed willingness to return to his home country during in-person or telephone interviews on nearly 20 occasions”, should read as “During the detention, the Applicant has repeatedly showed unwillingness to return to his home country during in-person or telephone interviews on nearly 20 occasions”;
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case
|
HCAL 1185/2022 [2022] HKCFI 3773 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 1185 OF 2022 ________________________
________________________ Before: Hon Coleman J in Court Date of Hearing: 19 December 2022 Date of Judgment: 19 December 2022 Date of Reasons for Judgment: 22 December 2022 Date of Corrigendum: 5 January 2023 ________________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ________________________ Please note the following corrigendum in the Reason for Judgment dated 22 December 2022: -
Dated the 5th day of January 2023
| ||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 1185/2022