HKSAR v. Choy Yuk Ling (蔡玉玲)
Read the full judgment text of FAMC 54/2022 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment.
1. We are satisfied that the two questions of law set out in the applicant’s Application for Leave to Appeal are involved in the decision from which leave to appeal is sought and that they are of the requisite importance and reasonably arguable. We therefore grant leave to appeal in respect of those questions, namely:
Cited by 1 case
|
FAMC No. 54 of 2022 [2023] HKCFA 1 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 54 OF 2022 (CRIMINAL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM HCMA NO. 236 OF 2021) ________________________
________________________ Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ, Mr Justice Fok PJ and Mr Justice Lam PJ Date of Hearing and Determination: 17 January 2023 ___________________________ D E T E R M I N A T I O N ___________________________ Mr Justice Fok PJ: 1.We are satisfied that the two questions of law set out in the applicant’s Application for Leave to Appeal are involved in the decision from which leave to appeal is sought and that they are of the requisite importance and reasonably arguable. We therefore grant leave to appeal in respect of those questions, namely:
2.Further, we grant leave to appeal on the ground that it is reasonably arguable that, in drawing the inference that the applicant knowingly made a false statement, substantial and grave injustice has been done to her in the courts below. 3.The appeal will be listed for hearing on 3 May 2023.
Mr Kei Rui Tien and Mr Geoffrey Yeung, instructed by Ho, Tse, Wai & Partners, for the Applicant Mr Derek Lau SADPP (Ag) and Mr Vincent Lee SPP, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent | |||||||||||||||
Other judgments that cite this case