Read the full judgment text of CACV 000737/2001 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 14 November 2001.
1. This is an appeal from a judgment of Beeson J handed down on 22 February 2001. The plaintiff's claim related to the sale of a microkeratome for use in lasik surgery. The plaintiff claimed that the microkeratome sold by the defendant did not correspond with the description that it must have a cutting head gap of 150 microns, was not reasonably fit for the purpose for which it had been sold and that it was not of merchantable quality. The basis of the claim stemmed from the plaintiff's allegati