Read the full judgment text of HCPI 199/2021 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 23 February 2023.
1. The defendant complained that the medical reports of the urologist and the psychiatrist adduced by the plaintiff amounted to solo expert reports obtained and adduced without leave and contrary to the direction of the court. The plaintiff disagreed on the ground that they were mere reports of the plaintiff’s treating doctors. The defendant therefore took out application to expunge the reports, which the master allowed in terms as she ordered. The plaintiff appealed. After hearing, this court d
Cites 1 case