Akram Muhammad v. Director of Immigration and Another

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 1329/2022 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 16 March 2023.

1.  At page 51 between line G and H, the words, “it seems to me that the appropriate costs order to make is no order as to costs”, should be read as “it seems to me that the appropriate costs order to make is no order as to costs, on a nisi basis”;

Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCAL 1329/2022[2023] HKCFI 595
Court
High Court CFI
Date16 Mar 2023
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL 1329/2022

[2023] HKCFI 595

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 1329 OF 2022

________________________

BETWEEN

  AKRAM MUHAMMAD Applicant
  and  
  DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION 1st Putative
    Respondent
  SECRETARY FOR SECURITY 2nd Putative
    Respondent

________________

Before: Hon Coleman J in Court
Date of Hearing: 17 January 2023
Date of Reasons for Decision: 16 March 2023
Date of Corrigendum: 21 March 2023

____________________

CORRIGENDUM

____________________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Reason for Decision dated 16 March 2023: -

1.  At page 51 between line G and H, the words, “it seems to me that the appropriate costs order to make is no order as to costs”, should be read as “it seems to me that the appropriate costs order to make is no order as to costs, on a nisi basis”;

Dated the 21st day of March 2023

  (Alvin Kwok)
for Registrar, High Court