Sino Ray Investment Ltd t/a Sino Ray Petroleum Co v. Lin Lipan and Another
Read the full judgment text of HCMP 133/2023 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 21 March 2023.
1. I have before me an originating summons dated 26 January 2023. The Plaintiff seeks an order which enables enforcement of a charging order absolute made on 24 November 2022 in HCA 875/2022 in respect of a judgment in those proceedings.
|
HCMP 133/2023 [2023] HKCFI 856 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 133 OF 2023 ________________
________________
________________
__________________ D E C I S I O N __________________ 1.I have before me an originating summons dated 26 January 2023. The Plaintiff seeks an order which enables enforcement of a charging order absolute made on 24 November 2022 in HCA 875/2022 in respect of a judgment in those proceedings. 2.In short, the charging order absolute is over shares in the 2nd Defendant. Despite a request to do so the 1st Defendant director of the 2nd Defendant has not executed the necessary instruments of transfer and bought and sold notes. 3.The Defendants did not appear before me today. I will make an order that the 1st Defendant execute the necessary documents and the 2nd Defendant register the transfer subsequent to their execution. 4.I will also make an order which permits a solicitor from the Plaintiff’s solicitor’s firm to execute the necessary documents if the 1st Defendant fails to do so within 10 clear calendar days of a written request being sent to him. The costs of these proceedings are to be paid by the 1st Defendant to the Plaintiff to be taxed if not agreed. I will also grant general liberty to apply.
Mr Kwan Ping Kan, instructed by Brenda Chark & Co, for the plaintiff The 1st defendant was not represented and did not appear The 2nd defendant was not represented and did not appear | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||