Ip Chen Ming Aka Chen Ming Ip v. Ip Cheu Keung Aka Chen (or Cheu) Keung Ip and Another

Case No.HCMP 367/2023[2023] HKCFI 996

Court

High Court CFI

Date12 Apr 2023

Judge—

Case Document

100%Judiciary

HCMP 367/2023

[2023] HKCFI 996

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 367 OF 2023

______________

	IN THE MATTER OF (1) ALL THAT one equal undivided 4^th part or share of and in ALL THOSE pieces or parcels of ground registered in the Land Registry as LOTS NOS. 25, 42, 48, 137, 672 AND 705 all in DEMARCATION DISTRICT NO.47 together with the messuages erections and buildings thereon (if any); (2) ALL THAT one equal undivided 4^th part or share of and in ALL THOSE pieces or parcels of ground registered in the Land Registry as LOTS NOS. 68, 75, 164, 166, 337, 339 AND 897 all in DEMARCATION DISTRICT NO.48 together with the messuages erections and buildings thereon (if any); (3) ALL THAT one equal undivided 8^th part of share of and in ALL THOSE pieces or parcels of ground registered in the Land Registry as LOTS NOS. 632, 662, 663 AND 678 all in DEMARCATION DISTRICT NO. 47 together with the messuages erections and buildings thereon (if any); and (4) ALL THAT one equal undivided 12^th part or share of and in ALL THOSE pieces or parcels of ground registered in the Land Registry as LOT NO. 74, SECTION A OF LOT NO. 673 and SECTION B OF LOT NO. 673 all in DEMARCATION DISTRICT NO. 47 together with the messuages erections and buildings thereon (if any) (“the said Properties”)
	and
	IN THE MATTER OF Section 45 of the Trustee Ordinance (Cap. 29)

______________

	IP CHEN MING also known as Chen Ming Ip (葉晉明)	1st Applicant
	IP CHEU KEUNG also known as	2nd Applicant
	Chen (or Cheu) Keung Ip (葉晉強)
	IP CHUN PING also known as Chun Ping Ip (葉晉萍)	3rd Applicant

______________

Before:

Deputy High Court Judge Suen SC in Chambers

Date of Hearing:	12 April 2023
Date of Decision:	12 April 2023
Date of Reasons for Decision:	14 April 2023

____________________

REASONS FOR

DECISION

____________________

INTRODUCTION

1.This is an ex parte application by the 1^st to 3^rd Applicants (by way of ex parte Originating Summons) for an order under section 45 of the Trustee Ordinance (Cap. 29) (“Ordinance”) to vest the subject properties (“Properties”) in the 1^st to 3^rd Applicants as tenants in common in equal shares.

BACKGROUND

2.The application is supported by the Affirmation of the Applicants.

3.The Applicants’ father (“Father”) was the beneficial owner of the Properties. He passed away on 18 June 1980. On 3 June 1996, the North District Officer gave approval for the Applicants to succeed to their father’s estate with their grandmother, Yau Yi (or Yee) Kiu (“Madam Yau”), as trustee pursuant to Approval of Succession dated 3 June 1996 and registered by Memorial No. N366905. The said Approval of Succession provided that the beneficial ownership of the Properties shall be vested in the Applicants as tenants in common in equal shares with Madam Yau as trustee, as she was then the trustee of the Father in respect of the Properties prior to the Father’s death.

4.Madam Yau passed away on 19 January 2006. Notwithstanding that, the Properties remain held by Madam Yau as trustee on record despite her death.

5.The Applicants have adduced evidence that no grant of letters of administration or probate in respect of Madam Yau’s estate has been issued to their knowledge. The Applicants’ solicitors have conducted a probate search in the Probate Registry of the High Court which confirms that no such grant of letters of administration or probate in respect of Madam Yau’s estate has been issued.

ANALYSIS

6.Section 45 of the Ordinance stipulates as follows:

“45. Vesting Orders

In any of the following cases, namely-

…

(e) where there is no personal representative of a deceased trustee who was entitled to or possessed of any interest in land, or where it is uncertain who is the personal representative of a deceased trustee who was entitled to or possessed of any interest in land;

…

the court may make an order (in this Ordinance called a vesting order) vesting the land or interest therein in any such person in any such manner and for any such estate or interest as the court may direct …”

7.On the evidence, I am satisfied that the circumstances of this case falls within section 45(e) of the Ordinance, in that there is no personal representative of Madam Yau, being the trustee (until her death) holding the Properties on trust for the Applicants.

8.I am also satisfied in the circumstances that there is no one to be served with the Originating Summons and that it would be proper for the application to proceed by way of an ex parte summons.

9.In the premises, I agree that the Properties should be vested in the Applicants.

10.Accordingly, I order under section 45 of the Ordinance that the Properties be vested in the Applicants as tenants in common in equal shares.

11.I make no order as to costs.

	( Jenkin Suen SC )
	Deputy High Court Judge

Mr SY Danny Chan of Leung Ki Hin & Co, for the Applicants