Mohammad Farooq v. The Permanent Secretary for Security the Director of Immigration Respondent

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 374/2022 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 22 December 2022.

1. At page 1 between line H and I the words, “1 st Respondent”, should be read as “1 st Putative Respondent”;

Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCAL 374/2022[2023] HKCFI 710
Court
High Court CFI
Date22 Dec 2022
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL 374/2022

[2023] HKCFI 710

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 374 OF 2022

________________________

BETWEEN

  MOHAMMAD FAROOQ Applicant
  and  
  THE PERMANENT SECRETARY 1st Putative
  FOR SECURITY Respondent
  THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION 2nd Putative
    Respondent

________________

Before: Hon Coleman J in Chambers (Open to Public)
Dates of Hearing: 22 December 2022
Date of Decision: 22 December 2022
Date of Corrigendum: 21 April 2023

_____________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

_____________________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Decision dated 22 December 2022: -

1.At page 1 between line H and I the words, “1st Respondent”, should be read as “1st Putative Respondent”;

2.At page 1 between line I and J the words, “2nd Respondent”, should be read as “2nd Putative Respondent”;

Dated the 21st day of April 2023

  (Alvin Kwok)
for Registrar, High Court