Read the full judgment text of CACC 000183/1976 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. The two respondents were charged with bribery contrary to s.9(2)(a) of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance (Cap. 201). The learned magistrate having found that neither had a case to answer, dismissed the charges and was thereupon asked to state a case for the purpose of appeal to a judge of the Supreme Court. This decision deals with the case so stated by the learned magistrate.