Read the full judgment text of CACV 000086/1996 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. In this appeal, the facts are hardly disputed. The amount of the claimed professional fees and expenses of $140,460 as adjudged in favour of the appellant (plaintiff) is relatively small. No effort has been made on behalf of the appellant (defendant) before us to deal with the plaintiff's alternative claim on a quantum mer uit basis. There was much debate on the plaintiff's claimed professional remuneration before the institution of the High Court action. It was heard by Leonard, J. who deliv