莊裕安 v. 律政司司長林定國

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 1243/2023 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 27 September 2023.

1. The Applicant has made an application for leave to apply for judicial review by way of a Form 86 filed on 20 July 2023. The Putative Respondent is the Secretary for Justice (“SJ”). In the Form 86, the Applicant asks for, inter alia , an order that the SJ should withdraw the prosecution against Mr Lai Chee Ying (“Lai”). The oral hearing of the leave application will take place on 2 November 2023.

Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCAL 1243/2023[2023] HKCFI 2492
Court
High Court CFI
Date27 Sep 2023
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL 1243/2023

[2023] HKCFI 2492

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST

NO 1243 OF 2023

____________________

BETWEEN

  莊裕安 Applicant
  and  
  律政司司長林定國 Putative Respondent

____________________

Before: Hon Anthony Chan J in Chambers
Date of Hearing: 27 September 2023
Date of Decision: 27 September 2023

________________

DECISION

________________

1.The Applicant has made an application for leave to apply for judicial review by way of a Form 86 filed on 20 July 2023. The Putative Respondent is the Secretary for Justice (“SJ”). In the Form 86, the Applicant asks for, inter alia, an order that the SJ should withdraw the prosecution against Mr Lai Chee Ying (“Lai”). The oral hearing of the leave application will take place on 2 November 2023.

2.This is the hearing of a Summons filed by the Applicant on 28 August 2023 seeking: (a) the appointment of amicus curiae for his judicial review; (b) the Court to provide the translation (should it be required) for the Chinese recordings contained in two DVD filed by the Applicant; and (c) the Court should consider joining Lai as a party to the judicial review given that he may benefit from the outcome of such proceedings.

3.The appointment of amicus is a matter for this Court. Normally, such appointment will only be made on difficult and important cases, especially where the Court sees the need for assistance in addition to what the litigant(s) may provide to it. I do not believe that the issues in the leave application are complicated. I decline the request for appointment of amicus.

4.Since the leave application will be heard by a bilingual Judge, there will be no need for translation of Chinese recordings.

5.Regardless of the merits of the application, it is premature to consider the joinder of parties to the judicial review prior to the granting of leave.

6.For these reasons, the Summons is dismissed with no order as to costs.

  ( Anthony Chan )
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

The Applicant appeared in person

Cited by 1 case

Other judgments that cite this case