莊裕安 v. 律政司司長林定國
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 1243/2023 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 27 September 2023.
1. The Applicant has made an application for leave to apply for judicial review by way of a Form 86 filed on 20 July 2023. The Putative Respondent is the Secretary for Justice (“SJ”). In the Form 86, the Applicant asks for, inter alia , an order that the SJ should withdraw the prosecution against Mr Lai Chee Ying (“Lai”). The oral hearing of the leave application will take place on 2 November 2023.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case
|
HCAL 1243/2023 [2023] HKCFI 2492 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 1243 OF 2023 ____________________
____________________
________________ DECISION ________________ 1.The Applicant has made an application for leave to apply for judicial review by way of a Form 86 filed on 20 July 2023. The Putative Respondent is the Secretary for Justice (“SJ”). In the Form 86, the Applicant asks for, inter alia, an order that the SJ should withdraw the prosecution against Mr Lai Chee Ying (“Lai”). The oral hearing of the leave application will take place on 2 November 2023. 2.This is the hearing of a Summons filed by the Applicant on 28 August 2023 seeking: (a) the appointment of amicus curiae for his judicial review; (b) the Court to provide the translation (should it be required) for the Chinese recordings contained in two DVD filed by the Applicant; and (c) the Court should consider joining Lai as a party to the judicial review given that he may benefit from the outcome of such proceedings. 3.The appointment of amicus is a matter for this Court. Normally, such appointment will only be made on difficult and important cases, especially where the Court sees the need for assistance in addition to what the litigant(s) may provide to it. I do not believe that the issues in the leave application are complicated. I decline the request for appointment of amicus. 4.Since the leave application will be heard by a bilingual Judge, there will be no need for translation of Chinese recordings. 5.Regardless of the merits of the application, it is premature to consider the joinder of parties to the judicial review prior to the granting of leave. 6.For these reasons, the Summons is dismissed with no order as to costs.
The Applicant appeared in person | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 1243/2023