Ronell International Ltd v. The Registrar of Companies
Read the full judgment text of HCMP 1543/2023 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 20 October 2023.
1. This is the application of Ronell International Limited (“the Applicant”) by notice of originating motion for, inter alia :
Cites 3 cases
|
HCMP 1543/2023 [2023] HKCFI 2734 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 1543 OF 2023 ________________________
________________________
________________
_________________ JUDGMENT _________________ 1.This is the application of Ronell International Limited (“the Applicant”) by notice of originating motion for, inter alia:
2.The Registrar of Companies who is the respondent adopts a neutral stance to this application and attendance at the hearing has been excused. 3.This application was made necessary by the discovery of overlooked assets more than 2 years after the dissolution of the Company in the circumstances described below. Background 4.The Applicant is a BVI company incorporated on 21 March 2000. 5.This application is supported by an affidavit of Poon Cheng Fai Geoffrey (“Geoffrey”) who is one of the shareholders of the Applicant since incorporation and a director since 30 December 2004. 6.Geoffrey’s late father, Poon Cho Yiu Ronald (“the Deceased”), passed away on 13 August 2022. During his lifetime, he gave shares in certain companies to Geoffrey and his mother Poon Lee Le Wah (“Mother”) who were nominated as directors but the companies had been operated and controlled by the Deceased. 7.The Company was incorporated in Hong Kong on 8 January 2003. Geoffrey was appointed a director of the Company on 29 August 2011 with the Deceased and Mother being the other directors. 8.As of 8 January 2018, the shareholding of the Company was as follows:
9.The shareholding structure and the board of directors remained unchanged until the Company’s dissolution on 25 June 2019. 10.By special resolution of the shareholders of the Company dated 4 April 2018, the Company was wound up voluntarily and the Deceased was appointed liquidator. 11.The Deceased made the Liquidator’s Final Statement of Account on 23 March 2019 and filed the same with the Companies Registry on 25 March 2019. 12.The dissolution of the Company took place 3 months later, on 25 June 2019, pursuant to section 239 (4) of the Ordinance. Discovery of assets 13.Following the Deceased’s death, in sorting out his affairs, a copy of a letter dated 10 August 2016 (“the letter”) signed by the Deceased as a director of Eco Farm Ltd (“Eco Farm”) to its solicitors in Macau, Messrs Manuela Antonio (“MA”) came to light. 14.Eco Farm was incorporated in Macau on 13 July 2011 and at the time of its incorporation, its share capital of MOP $25,000 was held as to MOP $15,000 by Ronell Holdings Limited and as to the remaining MOP $10,000 by the Company. 15.The letter stated, inter alia, that
16.Enquiries made with MA revealed that MA changed its office address in January 2014 and never received the letter. Moreover, an online company search conducted on 29 September 2022 confirmed that Eco Farm’s shareholding structure has remained unchanged since its incorporation. 17.As matters stand, the MOP $10,000 shares in Eco Farm remain registered in the Company’s name (which the Deceased had apparently overlooked) were not disposed of during the process of the Company’s liquidation. 18.A search made of the Applicant’s records did not reveal information relating to the Applicant’s acquisition of shares in Eco Farm. With the demise of the Deceased, it is now impossible to ascertain whether or not the transaction mentioned in the letter ever took place. 19.In the circumstances, Mr Vincent Wan, counsel for the Applicant submitted it is reasonable to infer that the transaction, for reasons unknown, did not take place. 20.The Registrar has confirmed that the Eco Farm shares are not held as bona vacantia. Applicable principles 21.The court has power under section 290 (1) of the Ordinance to declare the dissolution of a company void. The power may be exercised if
22.The period of 2 years under section 290 (1) may be extended if the court is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances justifying the extension: see section 290 (1A). 23.The purpose of an order under the English equivalent of section 290 (1) is to enable the distribution of overlooked asset belonging to the company and/or to enable the liquidator to make a claim which he has not previously made: see Re Servers of the Blind League [1960] 1 WLR 564 at 565 and Stanhope Pension Trust Limited v Registrar of Companies [1994] BCC 84 at 87 D-E cited in Re Central Pacific Enterprises Limited [2021] 2 HKLRD 477 at §23. 24.The meaning of the phrase “any other person who appears to the court to be interested” was considered by Megarry J in Re Roehampton Swimming Pool Limited [1968] 1 WLR 1693 at 1698E-G where he made the following observations:
25.An application that will enable the company to realise the property which belongs to it for the benefit of its members was held to be cleary justified: see Re Chan Brothers Investment Company Limited, unrep. HCMP 4053/2003, 9 October 2003, at §§10-11. The present application 26.The Applicant plainly is an interested person for the purposes of section 290 (1) and (1A) since it had a direct pecuniary interest in the Company as a shareholder prior to its dissolution. 27.I am satisfied that I should grant the extension requested pursuant to section 290 (1A) given that the overlooked assets did not come to light until after the expiration of the two-year period. The extension would enable the Applicant to realise its shares in Eco Farm for the benefit of all the members of the Company. 28.Upon revival of the Company, in the normal course, the former liquidator would resume office: see Re China Ample Development Limited, unrep., HCMP 907/2015, 7 May 2015, at §6. 29.As the Deceased was the former liquidator, it becomes necessary for the court to appoint a new liquidator for the Company under section 252 (1) of the Ordinance. 30.The Applicant seeks the appointment of Kwok Chi May. Having perused her curriculum vitae, I accede to that request. Order 31.I make an order in terms of the draft order as amended which incorporates an order that the Registrar’s costs of HK $5000 be paid by the Applicant.
Mr Vincent Wan, instructed by Eric Cheung & Lau, for the applicant The respondent was excused from attendance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment