Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 27 October 2023.
1. On the appeal, the appellant argued that he has a constitutional right to enter into a same-sex marriage under Hong Kong law (referred to in the judgment as “ Question (1) ”); alternatively, that the Hong Kong authorities are constitutionally obliged to provide a legal framework to enable his same-sex relationship to be officially recognised as a registered civil partnership or same-sex union in an appropriate form (“ Question (2) ”); or in the further alternative that he has a constitutional
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case