Mehta Karanjeet Singh v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 2215/2018 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 15 November 2023.
1. The applicant is an illegal immigrant by staying in Hong Kong without permission and he lodged a non-refoulement claim with the Director of Immigration (“the Director”). The Director rejected his application and he appealed to the Torture Claims Appeal Board (“the Board”). Having considered his evidence, the Board, by its Decision (“the Board’s Decision”), rejected his appeal and affirmed the Director’s Decisions.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case
|
HCAL 2215/2018 [2023] HKCFI 2646 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 2215 OF 2018 _____________ BETWEEN
_____________
_____________ D E C I S I O N _____________ The application 1.The applicant is an illegal immigrant by staying in Hong Kong without permission and he lodged a non-refoulement claim with the Director of Immigration (“the Director”). The Director rejected his application and he appealed to the Torture Claims Appeal Board (“the Board”). Having considered his evidence, the Board, by its Decision (“the Board’s Decision”), rejected his appeal and affirmed the Director’s Decisions. 2.The applicant filed Form 86 on 12 October 2018 to apply for leave to apply for judicial review of the Board’s Decision. 3.By Form CALL-1 dated 13 May 2022 (“the Court’s decision”), the Court granted leave to the applicant to apply for judicial review of the Board’s Decision within 14 days from the date of the Order. The applicant has failed to comply with the Court’s Order to file the originating summons to apply for judicial review of the Board’s Decision. 4.By affirmation filed on 25 August 2023, the applicant applied to withdraw his application because he wants to return to his home country. There is nothing outstanding in this action. 5.In accordance with the Court of Appeal in Re Manik Md Mahamudun Nabi [2022] HKCA 471 at §19:
6.The Court’s decision together with the Court’s Order are set aside and the applicant’s leave application is dismissed.
The applicant was unrepresented. |
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 2215/2018