Read the full judgment text of FACV 32/2007 on BabelCite. This FACV judgment was delivered on 8 December 2023.
1. This appeal was brought by the six appellants [1] who were resident or incorporated abroad, referred to below as the “Eastmore defendants” (“ the appellants ”). They had sought to challenge the jurisdiction of the Hong Kong court which had been assumed pursuant to orders granting leave to the respondent (“ the SFC ”) to serve the appellants out of the jurisdiction pursuant to O 11 r 1(1). [2] Such leave was based on the SFC’s claims for contravention of SFO section 274 and for relief under se
Cited by 1 case · Cites 2 cases