Read the full judgment text of DCCC 269/2020 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 27 December 2023.
2. There is no dispute that the 2 local Chinese victims in this case were robbed by 3 to 4 masked males with dark complexion. Both victims were unable to see the face of any robber. The only person who claimed to have seen the faces of the robbers was SO1 [1] (PW3). He said in his evidence that he had seen the robbers' faces prior to the robbery when they had not yet put on their masks. SO1 witnessed the robbery and relayed the descriptions of the culprits to his colleagues standing by in th
Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case