Mahmood Zafar v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office

CAMP 47/2023, [2023] HKCA 1380

On appeal from [2022] HKCFI 491

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 47 OF 2023

(ON AN INTENDED APPEAL FROM HCAL NO 2169 OF 2018)

________________________

________________________

________________________

J U D G M E N T

________________________

Hon Kwan VP (giving the Judgment of the Court):

1.This is the applicant’s notice of motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal handed down on 11 May 2023 ([2023] HKCA 652). The Court of Appeal refused to grant extension of time to appeal against the decision of Deputy High Court Judge K W Lung dated 28 February 2022 dismissing the application for leave to seek judicial review against the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board concerning the applicant’s non-refoulement claim.

2.Pursuant to paragraph 3 of Practice Direction 2.1, the Registrar of Civil Appeals had directed that the applicant shall lodge written submissions on or before 23 June 2023. It was further directed that the notice of motion shall be determined on paper only without an oral hearing upon compliance with the said direction or the expiry of the time for complying with the direction. The applicant did not lodge any written submissions by the prescribed deadline. Having considered the papers of this case, we think it is appropriate to determine this application on paper and proceed to do so.

3.The applicant is a Pakistan national. He entered Hong Kong illegally on 25 May 2014 and was arrested on 14 January 2015. On 16 January 2015, he lodged a non-refoulement claim. He claimed that: (1) he would be harmed or killed by his relatives due to a land dispute; and (2) his relatives, who belonged to the Pakistan People’s Party, would harm him due to his membership in the Muslim Conference Party.

4.In the notice of motion filed on 8 June 2023, the applicant stated as his ground of appeal that he did not get justice so he wants to go to the Court of Final Appeal.

Analysis and disposition

5.Section 22(1)(b) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance provides that an appeal shall lie to the Court of Final Appeal at the discretion of the Court of Appeal or the Court of Final Appeal, from any judgment of the Court of Appeal in any civil cause or matter, whether final or interlocutory, if, in the opinion of the Court of Appeal or the Court of Final Appeal, as the case may be, the question involved in the appeal is one which, by reason of its great general or public importance, or otherwise, ought to be submitted to the Court of Final Appeal for decision.

6.In the present application, the applicant has not identified any mistakes in the judgment of the Court of Appeal nor has he raised any question of great general or public importance which ought to be submitted to the Court of Final Appeal for determination in accordance with section 22(1)(b). There is also no basis for granting leave on the ‘or otherwise’ limb under section 22(1)(b).

7.For the above reasons, we refuse to grant leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal and dismiss the Notice of Motion filed on 8 June 2023.

The Applicant, acting in person