Read the full judgment text of CACV 000093/1981 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. This is another case arising on the application of the proviso to Section 52(1)(b) of the Landlord and Tenant (Consolidation) Ordinance. The trial judge was satisfied that the landlord had a present need for the premises in question and in the course of his judgment stated correctly the test which he should apply as to the proviso and the onus placed on the tenant by it when he said "I must now consider whether the defendant, who also gave evidence, has established on the balance of probabili