Nguyen Thi Ly v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 1397/2019 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 9 January 2024.
1. Paragraph 16 of Form CALL-1 should read as “For the reasons given in paragraph 9, the Board rejected her evidence and found that the applicant had failed to establish any real risk of harm if she returns to Vietnam.”.
Cited by 1 case
|
HCAL 1397/2019 [2023] HKCFI 3323 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST No. 1397 of 2019
____________________________ CORRIGENDUM ____________________________ Kindly note that the following correction in the Form CALL-1 handed down by Deputy High Court Judge K.W. Lung： 1.Paragraph 16 of Form CALL-1 should read as “For the reasons given in paragraph 9, the Board rejected her evidence and found that the applicant had failed to establish any real risk of harm if she returns to Vietnam.”. Dated the 9th day of January 2024
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 1397/2019