Ann an Wei Liang and Another v. Wong Junlan Suki and Others

Case No.HCA 1842/2021[2022] HKCFI 844

Court

High Court CFI

Date14 Jan 2022

Judge—

Case Document

100%Judiciary

HCA 1842/2021

[2022] HKCFI 844

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 1842 OF 2021

____________

BETWEEN
	ANN AN WEI LIANG	1^st Plaintiff
	W & A CONSULTING INC	2^nd Plaintiff
	and
	WONG JUNLAN SUKI	1^st Defendant
	LEE TIN LOK	2^nd Defendant
	CHEUNG WING PAN	3^rd Defendant
	CHOR WING KEI	4^th Defendant
	FIONA SAU KIT LAM	5^th Defendant
	WONG YUI WAI	6^th Defendant
	LAM WAI LUN DEVIL	7^th Defendant
	CHAN SIU HUNG	8^th Defendant
	CHAN HOI TIK HEMAN	9^th Defendant
	WONG MAN YI	10^th Defendant
	PENG WENZU	11^th Defendant
	NG TING LOK	12^th Defendant

____________

Before:

Hon Au-Yeung J in Chambers

Date of Hearing:	14 January 2022
Date of Decision:	14 January 2022

_____________

D E C I S I O N

_____________

1.I have found that the 2^nd affidavit of Li Lok Hin Daniel to be not up to standard and not up to the requirement of Bebe Chu J as set out in paragraph 2 of schedule 2 to the injunction order.

2.It is regrettable that a solicitor’s firm would interpret that order to think that a paralegal could make an affirmation as to the financial position of its own client instead of asking the client to make the affirmation herself.

3.Accordingly, I make an order for the firm of solicitors to be personally liable for the costs of and incidental to the preparation, filing and service of the 2^nd affidavit of Li Lok Hin Daniel. Such costs to include the costs of this hearing, less 10 minutes. The 10 minutes will be costs reserved as they involve the question of service of the amended writ on D6 to D10 and D12 and to continue the injunction in the meantime.

(Queeny Au-Yeung)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Ms Meng Ling, of Tanner De Witt, for the 1^st and 2^nd Plaintiffs

All Defendants were not represented and did not appear