Circuitronix, Llc v. Kingboard Chemical Holdings Ltd and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCA 1506/2014 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 29 December 2023.

1. The decision of 29th December 2023 omitted to address RASOC paragraph 12.5, which is now dealt with in this addendum at the parties’ request, and pursuant to the court’s jurisdiction to reconsider the decision before perfection of the order (see Wan Chi Hing v Strong Master Corporation Ltd , unreported, HCA 1554/2013, 8th December 2015 at [9]).

Cites 3 cases

Case No.HCA 1506/2014[2023] HKCFI 3359
Court
High Court CFI
Date29 Dec 2023
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 1506/2014

[2023] HKCFI 3359

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. 1506 OF 2014

____________

BETWEEN

  CIRCUITRONIX, LLC. Plaintiff
  and  
  KINGBOARD CHEMICALS HOLIDINGS LIMITED 1st Defendant
  KINGBOARD INVESTMENTS LIMITED 2nd Defendant
  JIANGMEN GLORY FAITH PCB COMPANY LIMITED 3rd Defendant
  TECHWISE CIRCUITS COMPANY LIMITED 4th Defendant
  TECHWISE (MACAO COMMERCIAL OFFSHORE) CIRCUITS LIMITED 5th Defendant

____________

Before: Hon Cheng J in Chambers
Date of Hearing: 28-29 September 2023
Date of Decision: 29 December 2023
Date of Addendum: 12 January 2024

_______________

A D D E N D U M

_______________

1.The decision of 29th December 2023 omitted to address RASOC paragraph 12.5, which is now dealt with in this addendum at the parties’ request, and pursuant to the court’s jurisdiction to reconsider the decision before perfection of the order (see Wan Chi Hing v Strong Master Corporation Ltd, unreported, HCA 1554/2013, 8th December 2015 at [9]).

2.The proposed plea is ambiguous and insufficiently particularised. There is no indication as to what were the past or continuing updated agreements to the price structure, said to have been made from time to time. The proposed plea is also unnecessary since the Plaintiff’s case is that the latest agreed structures were those in SA cl.E, which has already been pleaded in the existing paragraph 12.5.

3.I refuse leave to amend RASOC paragraph 12.5.

4.For the avoidance of doubt, this does not affect the leave given in respect of RASOC paragraph 13.3 which refers to the price structure being agreed from time to time, this being a plea of breaches of agreements as to pricing (insofar as the making of such agreements have been pleaded elsewhere in the RASOC) rather than a plea as to the making of agreements in the first place.

  (Yvonne Cheng)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Mr Edward Alder and Miss Jasmine Cheung, instructed by Clyde & Co., for the Plaintiff

Mr Bernard Man SC leading Mr Jacky Lam, instructed by Sidley Austin, for the 3rd Defendant