Hong Kong Ferry (Holdings) Co. Ltd. v. Chan Kwan Fat and Others
Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 8 January 1998.
1. The applicants' appeal was dismissed on 5 January 1995. The Lam Island appeal had already been determined by this Court. It was clear at that time the result of the appeal would depend upon the Lam Island case if that went to the Privy Council. In those circumstances this Court made provision for the defendants to apply for leave to appeal should the Lam Island case in the Privy Council eventually result in a decision in their favour. They now make an application for leave to appeal to the Co
|
CACV000094A/1994 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL 1994, No. 94
------------------------------------- Coram: Mortimer, V.-P., Godfrey, J.A. and Wong, J. in Court Date of Judgment: 8 January 1998 ---------------------- D E C I S I O N ---------------------- Mortimer, V.-P. (giving the decision of the Court) : 1. The applicants' appeal was dismissed on 5 January 1995. The Lam Island appeal had already been determined by this Court. It was clear at that time the result of the appeal would depend upon the Lam Island case if that went to the Privy Council. In those circumstances this Court made provision for the defendants to apply for leave to appeal should the Lam Island case in the Privy Council eventually result in a decision in their favour. They now make an application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal under that provision. 2. It comes before us late because there has been considerable difficulty, it would appear, in them being granted legal aid. That was not done until August 1997. This application was then made thereafter. So it comes before us. This is not opposed. The application is under s. 22(10)(b) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance (Cap. 484) under the "otherwise" provision. It is quite clear that leave ought to be granted in this case. Leave is granted. Costs of today should be costs in the appeal.
Representation: Mr Erik Shum (M/s Ho, Tse, Wai & Partners) for 1st, 7th, 11th, 12th and 18th Defendants/1st-5th Appellants Mr Johnson Lam (M/s Gallant Y.T. Ho & Co) for Plaintiff/Respondent |