Doan Trung Kien v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 1349/2021 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 30 January 2024.
1. This is the Applicant’s application by summons filed on 4 January 2024 (the “Summons”) seeking extension of time to apply for leave to apply for judicial review (“leave application”) of a decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office (the “Board”).
Cited by 1 case
|
HCAL 1349/2021 [2024] HKCFI 279 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 1349 OF 2021 ____________________
____________________
________________________ DECISION ________________________ Introduction 1.This is the Applicant’s application by summons filed on 4 January 2024 (the “Summons”) seeking extension of time to apply for leave to apply for judicial review (“leave application”) of a decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office (the “Board”). 2.The Applicant had previously made a leave application in respect of the Board’s decision on 27 September 2021. That leave application was refused by this Court on 28 June 2022 (the “Court’s decision”). A year and half later, he now seeks leave to make a second similar application out of time. Presumably, he does not like the Court’s decision. The proper course he should have taken was to appeal the Court’s decision. Time to appeal has now lapsed. He has advanced no grounds his summons or supporting affirmation in respect of the fresh leave application or any facts to support an appeal against the Court’s decision. To make a fresh application again under the circumstances is a clear abuse of proceedings. The application is therefore refused.
The applicant is not represented |
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 1349/2021