Everise Sinopharm Ltd. v. Homefield International Development Ltd.
Read the full judgment text of CACV 963/2000 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 25 May 2001.
1. The present appeal is dismissed. This is because the Official Receiver informs us that she never consented to the appeal being proceeded with. We make an order that the Petitioner is to have the costs of the appeal and Messrs Y.T. Szeto & Co. the solicitors who until yesterday were representing the Respondent should show cause within 14 days why they should not personally defray these costs.
|
CACV000963/2000 CACV 963/2000 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO. 963 OF 2000 (ON APPEAL FROM HCCW 214 OF 2000) ________________
________________
________________ Coram: Hon Mayo VP, Rogers VP and Le Pichon JA in Court Date of Hearing: 25 May 2001 Date of Judgment: 25 May 2001 ________________ J U D G M E N T ________________ Hon Mayo VP (giving the judgment of the Court): 1. The present appeal is dismissed. This is because the Official Receiver informs us that she never consented to the appeal being proceeded with. We make an order that the Petitioner is to have the costs of the appeal and Messrs Y.T. Szeto & Co. the solicitors who until yesterday were representing the Respondent should show cause within 14 days why they should not personally defray these costs. 2. Mr Tam will need to consider whether the directors wish to prosecute an appeal. If that is the case, they need leave to lodge the appeal out of time and to proceed with the appeal.
Representation: Mr Patrick Chong, instructed by Messrs Tang, Wong & Cheung for liquidator of petitioner Ms Phyllis Mckenna, Senior Solicitor for official receiver & liquidator Tam Kai Hing, director of respondent |