HKSAR v. Kong Ming Ling

HCCC 69/2020

[2023] HKCFI 739

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CRIMINAL CASE NO 69 OF 2020

________________________

________________________

________________

CORRIGENDUM

________________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Reasons for Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence dated 17 March 2023:

1.In paragraph 9 on page 5, lines C - D “he personally ticker in the C & E Detention/Guard Form” should read “and he personally ticked in the C & E Detention/Guard Form”.

2.In paragraph 23 on page 12, lines O - P “insufficient to inform the defendant pf the offence” should read “insufficient to inform the defendant of the offence”.

3.In paragraph 23 on page 12, lines R - T “R v Kulynycz [1971] 1 QB” should read “R v Kulynycz [1971] 1 QB 367”.

4.In paragraph 25 on page 14, lines C - D “not an official form of use of C & E officers generally” should read “not an official form of use by C & E officers generally”.

5.In paragraph 26 on page 14, lines J - K “that aal the case documents would be kept by the inmates themselves” should read “that all the case documents would be kept by the inmates themselves”.

6.In paragraph 29 on page 15, lines J - K “HKSAR v Chan Wai Keung [2003] 1 HJLRD 901” should read “HKSAR v Chan Wai Keung [2003] 1 HKLRD 901”.

Dated the 11^th day of April 2023