Chow Lily v. Chow Wai Wai Violet and Another

HCAP 22/2019

[2024] HKCFI 1251

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

PROBATE ACTION NO 22 OF 2019

____________________

__________________

____________________

DECISION ON COSTS

____________________

1.By my Decision handed down on 22 March 2024[1] (the “Decision”), I make a costs order nisi that P shall bear 60% of the costs of and occasioned by the Summons and this appeal, with certificate for 2 counsel when 2 were involved, to be summarily assessed (the “Costs Order Nisi”).

2.By letter of 26 March 2024, Ds sought an order that the Costs Order Nisi be varied to the extent that P’s costs liability should be increased to 90%.

3.Pursuant to directions which this Court subsequently gave, parties have filed their written submissions in support and opposition.  I have considered those submissions.

4.As I have stated in §90 of the Decision, in making the Costs Order Nisi, I have considered the overall conclusion which I had reached, the number of the Disputed Paragraphs which appeal I had dismissed and their relative importance.

5.In relation to the relative importance of the Disputed Paragraphs, I repeat §§52, 65, 73 and 79.  §311 goes to the primary issues.  P is successful in that regard.  To this extent, I agree with P’s submissions.

6.Ds submit that those of the Disputed Paragraphs which relate to Ma, Kuok and Tam have been excluded entirely, that P was unreasonable in introducing them in the first place, and that P disregarded the underlying objectives in doing so.

7.In my view, those factors have adequately been reflected by P being required to bear 60% of the costs here and below.

8.In all the circumstances, I refuse the application to vary the Costs Order Nisi, and make the same absolute.

9.I order that Ds shall bear the costs of this application to vary, also to be summarily assessed.  

10.Ds shall within 14 days from the date of this decision lodge their statement of costs, P to lodge her statement of objection 7 days afterwards, and Ds to lodge their reply within 7 days afterwards.

11.In that same time frame, P shall lodge her statement of costs for this application to vary, Ds to lodge their statement of objection, and P to lodge her reply.     

Written Submissions by Lily Fenn & Partners, for the Plaintiff

Written Submissions and Reply by Ms Teresa Wu and Ms Jacqueline Law, instructed by P.C. Woo & Co, for the 1^st and 2^nd Defendants