Read the full judgment text of CACV 365/2022 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 23 May 2024.
1. The respondent is a barrister and was found guilty by the Barristers Disciplinary Tribunal (‘the Tribunal’) of a complaint of discussing a case or taking instructions from or giving advice to the lay client without the presence of instructing solicitors or their representative, or otherwise acting in a professional capacity without the instructions of a solicitor, contrary to [142(a)] and/or [50(a)] of the Code of Conduct of the Bar of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region then in force
Cited by 1 case