King Mountain Investments Ltd and Another v. Tang Yuk Ling Dobe and Another
Read the full judgment text of HCA 257/2023 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 1 March 2024.
1. On page 12 between lines R and S, “…and that it was the 2nd Defendant who was to follow up…” should read as “… and that it was the Plaintiffs who were to follow up…”.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case
|
HCA 257/2023 [2024] HKCFI 606 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO. 257 OF 2023 ____________
____________
____________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ____________________ Please note the following corrigendum in the Decision dated 1 March 2024. 1.On page 12 between lines R and S, “…and that it was the 2nd Defendant who was to follow up…” should read as “… and that it was the Plaintiffs who were to follow up…”.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 257/2023