Wong Sun Keung v. Ho Chau & Sons (HK) Engineering Ltd and Another
Read the full judgment text of DCEC 2381/2023 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 17 June 2024.
1. This is an application by the applicant to join an intended 3 rd respondent, Wai Kit Engineering (Hong Kong) Limited, out of time. The legally represented 1 st and 2 nd respondents have been excused from attending today’s hearing. They have no objection to the applicant’s summons.
|
DCEC 2381/2023 [2024] HKDC 1045 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION CASE NO 2381 OF 2023 -------------------------------------- IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BETWEEN
--------------------------------------
----------------------- DECISION ----------------------- 1.This is an application by the applicant to join an intended 3rd respondent, Wai Kit Engineering (Hong Kong) Limited, out of time. The legally represented 1st and 2nd respondents have been excused from attending today’s hearing. They have no objection to the applicant’s summons. 2.The intended 3rd respondent had been properly and duly served with the summons together with the supporting affirmation. Despite the court having waited for 15 minutes, the intended 3rd respondent was absent. Neither has the intended 3rd respondent filed any documents indicating its position. 3.After having considered the affirmation filed in support, I am satisfied that there is good reason to allow the applicant to join the intended 3rd respondent as the 3rd respondent. Pertinently, the applicant only had the knowledge of the involvement of the intended 3rd respondent in the alleged accident after the solicitors for the 1st and 2nd respondents informed the applicant’s solicitors for the first time on 22 April 2024 about this company, which might have been the employer of the applicant. 4.Upon learning of this information, the applicant promptly issued this summons to join the intended party on 26 April 2024. In all the circumstances and for the reasons above, I am satisfied that this court should exercise its discretion to grant an order in terms of the summons as amended as per the discussion which I earlier had with Ms Chan:-
Ms M Chan, of B Mak & Co, for the applicant K B Chau & Co, for the 1st and 2nd respondents, was excused from attendance The intended 3rd respondent was not represented and did not appear | |||||||||||||||||||||||||