Rashid Zafar Ghori v. Director of Immigration and Another
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 786/2024 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 15 July 2024.
1. At page 12, between lines K and L, “However, the majority of such period cannot be attributed to a lack of diligence on the part of the Applicant” should read “However, the majority of such period cannot be attributed to a lack of diligence on the part of the Respondents”.
Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case
|
HCAL 786/2024 [2024] HKCFI 1863 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 786 OF 2024 ________________________
________________________
________________________ CORRIGENDUM ________________________ Please note the following amendment in the Judgment dated 15 July 2024: 1.At page 12, between lines K and L, “However, the majority of such period cannot be attributed to a lack of diligence on the part of the Applicant” should read “However, the majority of such period cannot be attributed to a lack of diligence on the part of the Respondents”.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 786/2024