Tung Po Decoration Engineering Ltd v. Great Bright Engineering Ltd

DCCJ 4853/2020

[2024] HKDC 1086

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CIVIL ACTION NO 4853 OF 2020

-------------------------

--------------------------

-----------------------------

CORRIGENDUM

-----------------------------

Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 2 July 2024:-

1.Page 44, paragraph 83(2), line P: “HK$745,220” should read as “HK$595,700”;

2.Page 45, paragraph 83(3) be deleted;

3.Page 46, paragraph 84, line M to N: “ HK$780,480 (HK$6,400 + HK$745,200 + HK$19,880 + HK$9,000)” should read as “HK$611,100 (HK$6,400 + HK$595,700 + HK$9,000)”;

4.Page 46, paragraph 85, line Q: “HK$946,000 (HK$165,520 + HK$780,480)” should read as “HK$776,620 (HK$165,520 + HK$611,100)”;

5.Page 49, paragraph 90(6), line N to O: “which is in fact the same item as paragraph 89(3) above” be added immediately before the ending semicolon;

6.Page 52, paragraph 106, line T: “HK$946,000” should read as “HK$776,620”;

7.Page 53, paragraph 106(5) be deleted;

8.Page 53, paragraph 107, line N to O: “HK$374,884.10” should read as “HK$205,604.10”;

9.Page 54, paragraph 109, line C: “HK$374,884.10” should read as “HK$205,604.10”;

10.Page 56-57, paragraph 118(2): “was HK$946,000. Ming’s estimation was thus less than 35% of the total price of the works. It would be a rather bold assertion that the Plaintiff was only able to perform less than 35% of the works after about 2 months while the Defendant would be able to complete the remaining 65% within about 2 weeks’ time.” should read as “was HK$776,620. Ming’s estimation was thus less than 42% of the total price of the works. It would be a rather bold assertion that the Plaintiff was only able to perform less than 42% of the works after about 2 months while the Defendant would be able to complete the remaining 58% within about 2 weeks’ time.”;

11.Page 57, paragraph 120, line G to H: “HK$946,000” should read as “HK$776,620”;

12.Page 57, paragraph 120, line J to K: “HK$787,494 (HK$946,000 – HK$158,506)” should read as “HK$618,114 (HK$776,620 – HK$158,506)”;

13.Page 78, paragraph 167(1), line C: “… the amount of HK$374,884.10” should read as “… the amount of HK$205,604.10”; and

14.Page 78, paragraph 168, line G to H: “… the balance of the Plaintiff’s award is HK$216,378.10” should read as “… the balance of the Plaintiff’s award is HK$47,098.10”.

Dated the 12^th day of September 2024