Read the full judgment text of CAAR 000020/1975 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. The respondent in this case was charged upon one count of robbery, two counts of burglary and of attempted burglary. He was convicted upon the burglary and attempted burglary count upon pleas of guilty and a plea of guilty to burglary upon the robbery count was accepted by the prosecution although the facts to which the respondent pleaded guilty would seem to have justified a conviction for robbery. Although the respondent has previous convictions for theft and burglary, in 1972 and 1973, he