Lau Chun Fai and Others v. Hanin Garment Manufactory Ltd.
Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 11 July 1995.
1. The history of this case is set out in the judgment which I delivered on 8th May. Since then, the Claimants have lodged an application for leave to cross-appeal on the prescribed form. On 27th June, the Registrar granted them an extension of their time for cross-appealing.
|
HCLA000128A/1994 1994 No. LTA 128 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG HIGH COURT ____________
____________ Coram: The Hon. Mr. Justice Keith in Court Date of hearing: 11 July 1995 Date of delivery of judgment: 11 July 1995 _________________ J U D G M E N T _________________ 1. The history of this case is set out in the judgment which I delivered on 8th May. Since then, the Claimants have lodged an application for leave to cross-appeal on the prescribed form. On 27th June, the Registrar granted them an extension of their time for cross-appealing. 2. For the reasons given in my judgment, I grant the Claimants leave to cross-appeal against the dismissal by the Presiding Officer of their claims for wages in lieu of notice, I allow their cross-appeals, I set aside the order of the Presiding Officer dismissing their claims for wages in lieu of notice, I declare that the Claimants' contracts could not have been terminated by notice of less than one month, and I direct that the cases of the Claimants be remitted to the Presiding Officer for him to decide what sums are due to the Claimants as wages in lieu of notice.
Representation: Mr. Alfred Liang, instructed by M/s. Michael N. Hwang & Co., for the Defendant/Respondent. Mr. Paul K.N. Wu, instructed by M/s. Wong Hui & Co., for the Claimants/ Appellants |