HKSAR v. Woo Ka Wah Wilcox

Read the full judgment text of DCCC 1254/2023 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 23 October 2024.

1. I must now determine sentence. I have convicted the defendant of the offence of careless driving, contrary to Section 38(1)  of the ordinance.

Cited by 1 case

Case No.DCCC 1254/2023[2024] HKDC 1867
Court
District Court
Date23 Oct 2024
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

DCCC 1254/2023

[2024] HKDC 1867

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CRIMINAL CASE NO 1254 OF 2023

________________________

  HKSAR  
  V  
  WOO KA WAH WILCOX  

________________________

Before:  Deputy District Judge Casewell
Date:  23 October 2024
Present:  Ms Alva Patricia E, Counsel on fiat, for HKSAR
  Mr McGuinniety Luke, instructed by Messrs Ho & Associates, for the defendant
Offence:   Causing grievous bodily harm by dangerous driving(危險駕駛引致他人身體受嚴重傷害)

________________________

REASONS FOR SENTENCE

________________________


1.I must now determine sentence. I have convicted the defendant of the offence of careless driving, contrary to Section 38(1)  of the ordinance.

2.Of significance in sentencing in respect of this particular charge is firstly, the nature and culpability of the defendant’s driving, and secondly, the damage caused by that driving.  The court cannot completely ignore the consequences of the driving in terms of the serious injury caused to the victim here but I must bear that in mind against the other factors of defendant’s culpability and also the actions taken by the victim in this case.

3.I have determined here that the defendant himself failed to make a check in his centre mirror, I accept that he would have checked his other mirrors, which perhaps and possibly would have revealed the presence of the victim before he started his reversing manouvre.  As I said, that shows that the defendant was taking care but not taking sufficient care in the circumstances. That is one factor that I consider.

4.The next factor I consider is that I have determined in this case the defendant is not the sole cause of this accident, the pedestrian herself in this case walked into a one-way street not at a pedestrian crossing and to a certain extent endangered herself in that manouvre.

5.Finally, there is the defendant’s driving record which show he may have a problem with driving in excess of speed but we are not concerned with that today, we are simply concerned about the care he took in the reversing manouvre. 

6.Overall, I believe this can still be dealt by way of a financial penalty and a period of disqualification.  What I shall order is a fine of $4,000 and disqualification for 6 months.  The defendant must take and complete a driving improvement course within 3 months of the expiration period of disqualification.

( Casewell )
Deputy District Judge

Cited by 1 case

Other judgments that cite this case

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under DCCC 1254/2023